Kelley Speach Rhetorical Analysis Enlgish Ap

In the 20th coulomb women and kidskinren faced many injustices across the unify States. Many endureers of the womens suffrage were to a fault advocates of peasant bray restrictions. Florence Kelley, an ambitious reformist and social worker, delivered a speech to the fanciful American Women Suffrage Association in Philadelphia on July 22, 1905 in beau monde to floor others to return changes in womans rights and tyke push back laws. Kelley purposefully courts to emotions of her auditory modality with the use of imagery and utilized parallel of latitude thought social system in fellowship to convey her distinguish level offs more conspicuously with the aid of literally elements.Kelley uses emotional appeal in her speech in order to win gain the charge of her auditory modality by manipulating the audiences emotions to ones Kelley feels willing get her sharpen across the best. She starts despatch her speech by exploitation a piece of data that evokes strong emo tion. In the first paragraph Kelley states that both one thousand thousand large number under the age of xvi courses are working. She thus goes except to state the gruesome jobs the children are doing such(prenominal) as working in cotton-mills and coal-breakers.She starts glowering with this emotional piece of data so that she can like a shot get the attention of her audience. Once the attention of her audience is gained she freely talks about her wants for the change in law scarce she constantly reflects keep going to emotional appeal by utilise imagery end-to-end her speech in order to keep the audiences attention. Another point she uses it is when she describes the treat of itty-bitty six or 7 year old girls in Georgia.Since at this point in time Georgia had no child toil laws Kelley uses the possible scenario of a little six or s tear down year old girl in Georgia whom is just up to(p) to dawn the bobbins working eleven hours a mean solar day to create the emo tion of sadness to bewilder the attention of her audience to her. She then immediately says and they will do so this evening while we sleep referring to the girls in her scenario to make the audience feel sadder about the built in bed and bringing the audiences even attention even more towards her.By acquiring the Audience sad by using imagery and drawing them into her contrast Kelley is able to bring her argument to the audience. Kelley excessively uses literary devices in order to make her get a line points in her argument seem stronger to the audience. Kelley conveys her key points throughout her speech with the use of parallelism. She repeats the alike concept of the unfair child labor laws in four paragraphs to emphasize the point of the unfair laws. She uses the similar abor laws in Alabama, Georgia, upstart Jersey and Pennsylvania to repeat the concepts throughout these four paragraphs of her speech and to make for sure her audience understands the importance of the unfair laws child labor laws in her argument. When describing these laws she uses literary elements to support her claim. For example she uses the implied positivity (the connotation) of the word perquisite to create a sarcastic affirmation that contains a paraxial set of words to stand up the sleaziness of the child labor law set in parvenue Jersey.Kelley does this when she states boys and girls, after their 14th birthday, enjoy the regretful privilege of working all shadow long. She then ties the audience into the argument of child labor by lastly tying the concepts of womens suffrage into her make do after she vividly describes the unfairness of child labor laws through imagery, and literary elements. Kelley also uses a parallel thought structure when talking about womens rights and how the enfranchisement of women could heal the child labor issues in the United States.She starts off the repeated intellections on womens liberty with a two rhetorical questions that gets t he audience even further intrigued in what she is going to say close. In sum, she asks the audience if women and teachers in Georgia could vote, would on that point still be unfair child labor laws. She then asks if women in in the buff Jersey could vote would the bill that enabled girls 14 and up to work all iniquity gift been passed. Of course due to the submit of her audience most of the audience would have been thinking at this point the dissolver to those questions are no.Kelley subliminally at this point utter the women were able to vote child labor wouldnt become as practically of an issue. She wants the audience to think this because it then alludes to her next point that agrees with the bias of most of the people in the path, enfranchise of women as a solution to child labor issues. Kelley then says until the freedom of women, all women in the owing(p) industrial states will have servile(prenominal) consciences and all people in the room should feel they have to participate in this beneficial change.Towards the end of her speech she repeats the idea ,due to her parallel though structure, again but more clearly that with the freedom of women women will be able to take the go into of children in the factories to reduce child labor. In sum, through her speech Kelley is able to effectively use rhetoric to persuade her audience in her claim of both the unfairness of child labor laws and how the enfranchisement of women would cooperate fix the issue.